Get Premium to hide all ads
लेखो: 19   द्वारा देखा गया है .: 195 users
03.05.2015 - 14:10
Is this the most you can send?

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 06:45
You could actually build tanks instead of only infantries. (watch second half for NC rush)

----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 10:48
लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 06:45

You could actually build tanks instead of only infantries. (watch second half for NC rush)



I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 11:02
लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 10:48

I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.

Usually NC rush though
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 11:59
लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 11:02

लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 10:48

I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.

Usually NC rush though

why use tanks tho?
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 15:04
लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 16:34
RA rush, more viable now, 20 tanks, 20 inf, +gen, and still nice income leftover
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 17:43
लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 15:04

लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 18:14
 Htin
लिखा द्वारा Cthulhu, 04.05.2015 at 16:34

RA rush, more viable now, 20 tanks, 20 inf, +gen, and still nice income leftover

in 3vs3 that would mean thier ally won't get money
----
Hi
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 18:16
लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

Have you tried it yet??
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 18:20
लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 18:16

लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

Have you tried it yet??

as u wish.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 18:55
लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 18:20

as u wish.

Haha I you too Sun anyway, I just think of buying tanks as a way to assure myself I've bought the most effective units in case I'm rushed. Paying for a NC inf against PD inf won't do any better than a tank.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
04.05.2015 - 23:21
लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 18:55

लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 18:20

as u wish.

Haha I you too Sun anyway, I just think of buying tanks as a way to assure myself I've bought the most effective units in case I'm rushed. Paying for a NC inf against PD inf won't do any better than a tank.


why do full rome as nc for spain anyways since GC PD RA all stronger in full rome
----
The best players are those who think outside the box and aren't afraid to try something new
लदान...
लदान...
05.05.2015 - 05:28
लिखा द्वारा Exo-K, 04.05.2015 at 23:21

why do full rome as nc for spain anyways since GC PD RA all stronger in full rome

Cause of the huge movility and the mixed possibility of playing it either deffensive or offensive, depending on how you play NC. It's quite versatile later in the game.

You can rush turn 1 rome and turn 2 attack UK with a 20 inf stack. The increased range for transport ships with NC is really awsome playing with Spain since it's full of ports and surrounded by water. PD and RA are not that versatile, you either use them deffensive or offensively since their main strength is just one of them both. GC is a different story but I still prefer the ship boost to the wierd GC boost/nerf of inf and tanks.

It's all about personal preferences. That doesn't mean NC is the best, it all depends on how you play them.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
06.05.2015 - 05:47
Soldier001
खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है।
लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 15:04

लिखा द्वारा Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

build more tanks...
लदान...
लदान...
06.05.2015 - 07:27
लिखा द्वारा Guest, 06.05.2015 at 05:47

build more tanks...

And then let Soldier001 command them
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

लदान...
लदान...
11.07.2015 - 17:50
Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?
लदान...
लदान...
11.07.2015 - 19:26
लिखा द्वारा jimmynow, 11.07.2015 at 17:50

Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?

because NC gives +5 capacity to naval transports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think GC is the best full rome
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


लदान...
लदान...
11.07.2015 - 19:34
लिखा द्वारा The Tactician, 11.07.2015 at 19:26

लिखा द्वारा jimmynow, 11.07.2015 at 17:50

Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?

because NC gives +5 capacity to naval transports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think GC is the best full rome

Ahhh thank you
लदान...
लदान...
हमारे साथ शामिल हों

प्रचार कीजिये