Gard wants to play AtWar more! Point and laugh!

लिखा द्वारा Tirpitz406, 19.03.2014 at 09:57

लिखा द्वारा Guest, 19.03.2014 at 09:40

लिखा द्वारा Tirpitz406, 19.03.2014 at 09:34

Unbalanced? i saw axis and allies winning in WW2 games.
you maybe should make an statistic showing the wins and looses of different europe+ team combinations to show that even this is balanced,
then you can make an statistic of WW2 games showing if it's unbalanced...

RA tanks spamming...well...on some maps, this really SUCKS BIG BALLS, but on others like (again ) WW2 i would not recommend tank spamming, as these games are close to world games, even WW1s and other games are hard to handle when you have about 1000 income total and tanks cost a lot

There are so much WWs I don't know which one you mean, haha.
But from what I saw, germany and some other stuff are full of reinforcements, while UK and some other countries have nothing.
Also, the "walls" are just autistic. The city walls I mean. They shouldn't be put there, AW does not work like that :S
Sure every team can win like you can win with poland belarus hungary in a 3v3 lol. It's about players.
Tank spamming is absurd, yes. But most of newbies think these games like UN, WW etc are fun because they have unlimited money and it's the only way they can play.

well, i mean ultimate WWII, it's fun to play that and it's quite balanced, even though the team thing you sayed is true, i once saw a russia winning against germany but then china died, you should give it a try

well, the walls are there to save time, wich is quite good, as the first turn in scenarios is like the second turn as Ukraine...
but seriosly, i always replace these expansive inf walls with milita walls xD

btw: some scenarios are a good way of bringing noobs in the competitive range, i once played some un games too ...but then i discovered (as a rank 5 or so) the fun of WW1s and europe+, then i became a quite good rank 7 and then i stoped playing europe+'s for a while and became as "meh" skilled as i am today

लिखा द्वारा Guest, 19.03.2014 at 09:59

Alright..This convo has ended since no agreement and even though I can proove it, it's a meh.

लिखा द्वारा Guest, 19.03.2014 at 12:03

No Gard, don't play atWar. Everytime you try to do so you also start annoying the shit out of people and found terrible coalitions with even worse players than you, writing maniac 'coalition histories' nobody cares to read.
I like you far better in the forums, also chatting with you is nice (once every three years, so send me a pm, it's been a while), but don't play again please.
Have a nice day.

PS: Do not ever quit atWar though, we need you here, the fact that everybody else is a complete moron makes you rather likable.

लिखा द्वारा Guest, 19.03.2014 at 15:09

लिखा द्वारा Pinheiro, 19.03.2014 at 14:57

I truly don't want to sound rude, but if you want to play, just click on the play link on the right top corner and enjoy.

It's much more complicated than that, in my own relative opinion. I know next-to-nothing about gameplay nowadays, and from what I hear, 90% of all games are UN and bad scenarios, plus that friendliness has drastically gone down over time. I've been reluctant to play because of that, and I've desperate for reasons to play, because I truly do, but not if it's what people say it is, if you get what I mean.

लिखा द्वारा Pinheiro, 19.03.2014 at 14:57

I truly don't want to sound rude, but if you want to play, just click on the play link on the right top corner and enjoy. It's way easier than to create and discuss it in a thread, which I find useless personally.

Anyway, it won't hurt to try a couple of games and, if you don't like it, just go back to your old status.