|
Blah blah blah stfu for once you noob and stop whinning, literaly every fucking thread u make is complaining or crying about somthing and having a bitchass fit till the next fucking shit u post..
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I wish mods would do their job
----
Our next Moments are Tomorrows Memories
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Indeed mods tell syrian to stick to 1 thread for his bitching fits please
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I wish mods would do their job
i agree
लदान...
लदान...
|
Eagle (मध्यस्थ) लेखो: 1481 (Message) से (User): सर्बिया
|
Yeah LB seriously needs to be nerfed, this just got out of hand. LB has become IF with bigger range and better critical. Just now 19 inf 4 tanks 7 mil at and a gen LB attacked 22 inf and a gen IF in defense, 5 mil at and a gen surviving. LB has an op defense, even stronger attack, it can outmaneuver almost any current strat, either on EU or bigger maps. I suggest you either reduce the critical or add back the +10 cost to the units.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 27.01.2018 at 10:32
Yeah LB seriously needs to be nerfed, this just got out of hand. LB has become IF with bigger range and better critical. Just now 19 inf 4 tanks 7 mil at and a gen LB attacked 22 inf and a gen IF in defense, 5 mil at and a gen surviving. LB has an op defense, even stronger attack, it can outmaneuver almost any current strat, either on EU or bigger maps. I suggest you either reduce the critical or add back the +10 cost to the units.
You would have won if you had 1 more unit defending.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Why PD inf + militia have no nerfs but boosts with 2 defence?
either they should get only 1 defence (against tanks) or pd inf should cost 60 but those tanking infantry that are very fast are absurd everybody is using PD all around of europe even with turkey i dont hear anybody mentioning the over usage of this free boost strategy whats the point of none then?
with the benefits must come the resolutions and actually 5 PD inf have bigger chance on defeating 10 attacking inf than LB inf think about it....
LB is op? i guess PD inf are more powerful/transportable/defensive then LB inf
seriously PD is free boost strategy that needs some balancing to stop the cancerous PD spams all around
Seriously, apply this logic to any strategy and you can conclude it needs a nerf.
Being easier to play well means that more people can play it well, but that doesn't mean it is overpowered.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I suggest + 15 more crit to LB
----
The enemy is in front of us, the enemy is behind us, the enemy is to the right and left of us. They cant get away this time! - General Douglas Mcarthur
लदान...
लदान...
|
Eagle (मध्यस्थ) लेखो: 1481 (Message) से (User): सर्बिया
|
LB vs PD, nothing more to add
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 13:21
LB vs PD, nothing more to add
Seriously if you had 1 more you could have won.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.
Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL
The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
लदान...
लदान...
|
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। |
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है।
लिखा द्वारा 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54
Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.
Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL
The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.
Kind of agree with nic.
The most surprising, in that ss, is that nic is e-list and ignored, then Eagle cannot even see his answer, the reason why i quote it.
Nic and Eagle are both good guys
लदान...
लदान...
|
Eagle (मध्यस्थ) लेखो: 1481 (Message) से (User): सर्बिया
|
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54
Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.
Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL
The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.
lmao no, 6 tanks are not meant to do that to pd units. Those rolls are outrageous.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। |
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है।
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
Must say that this one is outrageous.
The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
लदान...
लदान...
|
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। |
Gal खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है।
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
Must say that this one is outrageous.
The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
Must say that this one is outrageous.
The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
Must say that this one is outrageous.
The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans
or 1 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 at and 107 gens
who knows
----
Do you fear death? Do you fear that dark abyss? All your deeds laid bare. All your sins punished.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
60inf 50mil 2tanks vs 50inf 2ATS 1 bomber rest militia.
लदान...
लदान...
|
Eagle (मध्यस्थ) लेखो: 1481 (Message) से (User): सर्बिया
|
Lb attacking pd
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 30.01.2018 at 19:23
Lb attacking pd
If you had 1 more you would have won.
लदान...
लदान...
|
Sexy Girl लेखो: 316 (Message) से (User): क्यूबा
|
लिखा द्वारा 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54
Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.
Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL
The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.
firstlyz it be surprisingz seez
secondly you have just admitted dat LBz iz outrageouz by claiming dat diz iz normalz
but it be at war'z random rollz systemz massin + deludin us broz.. tehehehehhehe
लदान...
लदान...
|
Sexy Girl लेखो: 316 (Message) से (User): क्यूबा
|
लिखा द्वारा Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell
Must say that this one is outrageous.
The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans
still if he sent 2 more he would have wonz tehehehehehehe
लदान...
लदान...
|
Sexy Girl लेखो: 316 (Message) से (User): क्यूबा
|
लिखा द्वारा LukeTan, 27.01.2018 at 22:34
Why PD inf + militia have no nerfs but boosts with 2 defence?
either they should get only 1 defence (against tanks) or pd inf should cost 60 but those tanking infantry that are very fast are absurd everybody is using PD all around of europe even with turkey i dont hear anybody mentioning the over usage of this free boost strategy whats the point of none then?
with the benefits must come the resolutions and actually 5 PD inf have bigger chance on defeating 10 attacking inf than LB inf think about it....
LB is op? i guess PD inf are more powerful/transportable/defensive then LB inf
seriously PD is free boost strategy that needs some balancing to stop the cancerous PD spams all around
Seriously, apply this logic to any strategy and you can conclude it needs a nerf.
Being easier to play well means that more people can play it well, but that doesn't mean it is overpowered.
i do only see + + + + and not any - except for the tankz(da one dat matterz) but i believe dat +12% chancez to do +8 damage every hitz be worthy morez den +10 costz
be addin dat all of lb unitz has as good offensive as its defensive rollz in da game D
now letz compare it to PD
Results:
1- lb inf are better at attackingz den pd infz
2- LB tankz be worthy likez 2 pd tankz so arez bomberz as dey be +14 critical more den PD unitz
3- +10% free +6 damagez chance +1 range seems betterz at defendingz den +1 defz D
you be wildin out broz tehehehehehehehehehehe
लदान...
लदान...
|
Eagle (मध्यस्थ) लेखो: 1481 (Message) से (User): सर्बिया
|
Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27
Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
He's blitz you noob.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27
Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
He's blitz you noob.
He was imperialist
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Wheelo, 31.01.2018 at 20:44
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27
Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
He's blitz you noob.
He was imperialist
Tanks with gen op
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
When people get used to their "LB rolls" so 4 tanks killing 16 pd units is something completely normal and expected.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लिखा द्वारा Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27
Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
oh noes!! 5 tanks killed 17 infs
almost as if stack bonus and general werent the reason behind that.
Nerf imperialist, 4 infs had killed off my 5 LB tanks, this is unbelievable
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
लदान...
लदान...
|