RA Tanks were changed to 90 Cost

लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 12.06.2015 at 06:47

लिखा द्वारा International, 12.06.2015 at 06:42

When you're playing RA, turnblock is death.How do you prevent turnblocks? By walling everything! Never mind that the 3-militia-wall now costs $120 apiece...

Tb is actually crucial for any strategy. But if I had to chose the most vulnerable to tbs, that would be SM, not RA.
You usually get militias when conquering a city, so that's no problem at all lol

RA v. RA Africa 3k$ 1v1 is really quite fun.

There are certain countries nobody bothers to get because they cost more in militia upkeep than they're worth.

लिखा द्वारा International, 12.06.2015 at 07:00

RA v. RA Africa 3k$ 1v1 is really quite fun.

There are certain countries nobody bothers to get because they cost more in militia upkeep than they're worth.

So what's your point?

लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 12.06.2015 at 07:21

लिखा द्वारा International, 12.06.2015 at 07:00

RA v. RA Africa 3k$ 1v1 is really quite fun.

There are certain countries nobody bothers to get because they cost more in militia upkeep than they're worth.

So what's your point?

My point is in my first post.

लिखा द्वारा International, 11.06.2015 at 22:31

RA is overpowered? What is this joke?

If you nerf RA, please kindly inform us how us novices, who don't have the infantry upgrades yet, are supposed to even have a chance of winning games.

Everything afterwards is just sleepy ramblings that you shouldn't take so seriously...

लिखा द्वारा International, 12.06.2015 at 07:30

RA is overpowered? What is this joke?
If you nerf RA, please kindly inform us how us novices, who don't have the infantry upgrades yet, are supposed to even have a chance of winning games.

Well, overpowered maybe is too strong of a word... but yeah, RA is stronger than it might seem at first sight. Not sure if it's authentically balanced in this right moment though, I don't think I can "calculate" that so I rather not say anything stupid in case I might regret it later XD I'll just say that I've got a light suspect that tells me that RA > PD if you can afford it (Poland for example).

लिखा द्वारा International, 12.06.2015 at 07:30

Everything afterwards is just sleepy ramblings that you shouldn't take so seriously...

Makes everything funnier

How about learning to adapt to new circumstances for once instead of crying over every single change that challenges one's conventional gameplay.
Instead of taking it as an opportunity to become even better at this game and having one more playable strategy on top of that people cry and make shitty threads. This goes especially for the 'skilled' Europe+ players who repeat the same expansion with minor variation in every single 3v3, and did so for the last three years.
I feel you guys, if something new comes along you feel threatened in your pro status because it gives other players the opportunity to become good at something that you're not good at, and if you wanted to adapt you would have to invest an amount of time that you're simply not willing to invest anymore. You want to stay 'skilled' without doing actual work, playing coalition wars in the save same environment where you became good and can claim to be good.
At least play the fucking game with new RA for two months after a change and see if you can adapt to the strategy before crying in the forums.
You guys are literally autistic, and that comes from me.

लिखा द्वारा RaulPB, 12.06.2015 at 06:10

So, you'd leave your cap wide open as bait, wait for him to attack it with everything and then take it back. Easy!

That would only work if the player hit one target. The idea is to hit as many countries as you can because you already know that RA won't defend, and if he does then you won't lose much troops and he will lose income.

As for the Tank 5 def against infantries 4 attack.... Tanks cost 90, Infantries cost 50. You'd still win (by cost) unless you are playing a game in which being reinforce-efficient is important (Outside of Europe). Also, assuming you manage to TB him then that will be BRUTAL ad regardless whenever he wins or not, the income will hurt him.

लिखा द्वारा Guest, 12.06.2015 at 08:02

How about learning to adapt to new circumstances for once instead of crying over every single change that challenges one's conventional gameplay.

Instead of taking it as an opportunity to become even better at this game and having one more playable strategy on top of that people cry and make shitty threads.

This goes especially for the 'skilled' Europe+ players who repeat the same expansion with minor variation in every single 3v3, and did so for the last three years.

I though you were part of those "skilled Europe+ AKA Fake competitive players". But nvm #Respect.

Fully support.

लिखा द्वारा clovis1122, 12.06.2015 at 09:30

लिखा द्वारा Goblin, 12.06.2015 at 09:18

since most skilled 3v3 europe players actually are very skilled on other maps

If they know how to adapt to another map is for sure because they didn't played 3v3 for 3 years only. Anyway you can always prove me wrong an duel me anywhere not eu

(Duel me or I won't reply to you anymore here. ANY MAP OUTSIDE OF EUROPE).

how u make this signature? it isn't video but it moves!

लिखा द्वारा clovis1122, 12.06.2015 at 09:30

लिखा द्वारा Goblin, 12.06.2015 at 09:18

since most skilled 3v3 europe players actually are very skilled on other maps

If they know how to adapt to another map is for sure because they didn't played 3v3 for 3 years only. Anyway you can always prove me wrong an duel me anywhere not eu

I didn't actually say that i was the skilled 3v3 EU player.

I think it's fine now.

लिखा द्वारा clovis1122, 12.06.2015 at 09:12

I though you were part of those "skilled Europe+ players".

Yes I am a competitive player and I take a pride in it. I also think that Europe+ is the most versatile map and hence should stay the center of the competitive scene until something better comes along. And while all this is my opinion that doesn't mean that I condone the stagnation in gameplay that occurred in the last years. When somebody who joined in early 2013 comes along and tells me that players are so much more versatile and skillful these days in comparison to the old elite, which 'obviously wasn't able to adapt and keep up with the times', and then goes on and bashes every single modification the second it arises, it means that he became part of the very same group of conservative oldfags he criticized in the first place, without even noticing.
I am all for moderate change of gameplay and the resulting progress, and while I don't agree with you and your weird 3k-Australia-capture-Armenia-duels agenda and most of the other weird stuff you post here all the time, I can't stand the hypocrisy of some people in the competitive scene either.

I cant stand people who skip picks and wait for me to pick first.

अवतरण:

लिखा द्वारा Azula., 12.06.2015 at 00:54

How about this is a point on the object. All strats are good now, so why would people change them again and again their is no solid fundation in that. Seems like the only thing people want to do here is nerf and buff strategies.

Not like you can do anything else with strategies? Can hardly kiss or hugg the strategies. Now why aint I surpised you or soldier commenting about blitz in a thread which is about RA.

On topic:
Also who is making these decisions of changing strats everytime without updating the community? I noticed about the 90 cost for RA tanks lately too and I think its not normal for such strong units have like almost the same costs as fking imp tanks!? LOL...

Please make a forum about this and discuss with the community before implenting stuff like this.. stop destroying AW just to pleasure yourselfs or your clanbuddies who can only spam spam spam rush rush rush rush with shitty strats like RA and blitz with low cost countries ... -.- learn something else..

लिखा द्वारा Acquiesce, 12.06.2015 at 11:24

I think it's fine now.

I actually played RA and played against RA consciously a few more times and I've changed my mind. RA is broken. Pls fix.

लिखा द्वारा Acquiesce, 12.06.2015 at 15:56

लिखा द्वारा Acquiesce, 12.06.2015 at 11:24

I think it's fine now.

I actually played RA and played against RA consciously a few more times and I've changed my mind. RA is broken. Pls fix.

Did laochra threat you with ban?

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 12.06.2015 at 15:48

stop destroying AW just to pleasure yourselfs or your clanbuddies who can only spam spam spam rush rush rush rush with shitty strats like RA and blitz with low cost countries ... -.- learn something else..

At least Goblin always did it with high cost countries that were not OP counters

Would like to say one more thing ...its funny how players who constantly speak about "Europe is not AW, there are other maps" never actually look at strategies in global, but always judge them based mainly on Europe.

Tunder gave his opinion above focusing on RA in other maps and funds ...no one said a word.

लिखा द्वारा Goblin, 12.06.2015 at 16:23

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 12.06.2015 at 15:48

stop destroying AW just to pleasure yourselfs or your clanbuddies who can only spam spam spam rush rush rush rush with shitty strats like RA and blitz with low cost countries ... -.- learn something else..

At least Goblin always did it with high cost countries that were not OP counters

Would like to say one more thing ...its funny how players who constantly speak about "Europe is not AW, there are other maps" never actually look at strategies in global, but always judge them based mainly on Europe.

xaxa ikr

Let this thread be a shining example as to why we dont leave strategy/gamemechanic adjustments to the desires of the masses.

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 12.06.2015 at 17:19

Let this thread be a shining example as to why we dont leave strategy/gamemechanic adjustments to the desires of the masses.

who is we

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 12.06.2015 at 17:19

Let this thread be a shining example as to why we dont leave strategy/gamemechanic adjustments to the desires of the masses.

Such arrogance how do you sleep at night?

लिखा द्वारा Acquiesce, 12.06.2015 at 18:16

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 12.06.2015 at 17:19

Let this thread be a shining example as to why we dont leave strategy/gamemechanic adjustments to the desires of the masses.

Such arrogance how do you sleep at night?

Am I the only one who see this thread bad.........

लिखा द्वारा clovis1122, 12.06.2015 at 19:40

Am I the only one who see this thread bad.........

No, of course not ...plenty of irrational players like you who can't stand any discussion about strategies, but like to force others into other meaningless discussions.

RA has the advantages of imp but instead of -1 is +1 attack and the advantages of blitz but instead of -1 def is +1 defense.
With general in the stack, RA Tanks have the same defense as default infantry..... (11 attack and 6 defense)

Keep calm and build more tanks !

लिखा द्वारा Ferlucci1389, 13.06.2015 at 09:22

Keep calm and build more tanks !

BUILD MORE TAAAAAAAANKS !

Hue you noobs just noticed this change while it happened a while ago...btw learn to adapt instead of crying your little hearts out.

Hue you noobs just noticed this change while it happened a while ago...btw learn to adapt instead of crying your little hearts out.

लिखा द्वारा 1GodofWar1, 13.06.2015 at 12:37

Hue you noobs just noticed this change while it happened a while ago...btw learn to adapt instead of crying your little hearts out.

Learn how to respond with decent arguments about the topic at hand instead of using ad hominem fallacies.

लिखा द्वारा Goblin, 13.06.2015 at 12:42

लिखा द्वारा 1GodofWar1, 13.06.2015 at 12:37

Hue you noobs just noticed this change while it happened a while ago...btw learn to adapt instead of crying your little hearts out.

Learn how to respond with decent arguments about the topic at hand instead of using ad hominem fallacies.

learn to adapt instead of crying your little hearts out. thats a suggestion not an argument...goblin please learn how to read a post before you go and attack the author