19.01.2015 - 09:29
what are you talking about?
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 09:30
You will have to ask the mods, as it is their job to interpret the rules and enforce them as they think is best for the game.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 09:35
no no no no no, you can not say that atwar runs on a good government where the mods make the rules, then interpret the rules then execute the rules, if mods do not make the rules clear they can not interpret it to their advantage, since they have total control over the rules they should just simply make clear statements and not leave it for interpretation because I will find any loophole they leave
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 09:41
Define me a personal reason? Me being an asshole is not justifiable ...but if someone tells me "fuck off you retarded piece of fuckin shit i hope your mother dies from fuckin cancer you fuckin idiot!!!!!" I ...have to let this person, play on the fruits of my hard work? Who gave this person rights to insult me and enjoy my work? I want that in the rules aswell, rules that mods didnt give, but insulted everyone with pathetic 23. that they made ...when Columna said they are working on rules i thougth they will give us rules too follow. What we got is: "fuck you, we made a rule that give us the ability to decide what the rule is". ...and first sentence "map makers can ban anyone bla bla ..." should make it fine. Dont make me laugh.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 09:47
Goblin is still right. Why could I not get the strike to say this, smh this is why things like the Senate and these strikes fail, people arent as smart as Goblin and instead are retarded.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 09:54
You did when you decided to publish the map btw, if he insults you, screenshot & send to the mods, yadda yadda yadda
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:20
Thats what i want ...screenshot it send it too mods and to be allowed to ban this person from playing on my map. Deal. Give us rules for bans ...dont give us crap 23. guideline. And i certanly didnt give anyone right to insult me pulse.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:33
yep, but you still can't ban someone from your maps because they insulted you
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:36
Ofc, if the issue you're talking about is non-sense, as admin I'd ask you to gtfo politely. If we're talking about mods not doing their job properly and having provided solid evidence, then admins would take your words seriously. If it were true that mods were biased, you would have done plenty more than you've been doing untill now about it, and you would have proofs as well. Each time that you guys talk I seem to have clearer that you've got the "power" flu. Anyhow, the only persons to give you such power are admins and as far as I see... they dont give a shit about you. They must have their reasons for sure though...
---- Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you. We're all people.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:45
Oh, and why is that ...give me an explanation, a good one? and still no answer on why rule 23. is so lamely made.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:47
What if he joined your map just to insult that map and yourself? Wouldn't that be a fair enough ban? He's actually affecting the game in a negative way and being disrespectful on purpose against the map maker.
---- Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you. We're all people.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:49
You can hire 50% of map makers to kill the other 50% Call in the union busters, let there be no concessions Map makers should be so lucky to work for our grand society you guys kinda fucked up the game I honestly hope you get less power
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:55
quoting rule 23
If you are insulted, that's an offense and you should screenshot it and report it to the mods. IMO this whole problem would be averted if there were Terms of Service to be accepted when publishing a map. The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it. If it were up to me, banlists wouldn't even exist or in a very limited manner (i.e. banning people from games you host).
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 10:57
That's a perfectly good reason for adding the player to your personal ban list, screen shot the insult and report to the mods.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:11
Why would you respond to me by quoting a rule i called bullshit. And terms and conditions you mention is something i said somewhere ...well at the start of this debate. And i also said ...you cant retroactively make me sign terms and conditions now.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:19
You'd be able to remove your maps from the game if you don't agree with the changes. I'm not saying they'll come, but it's something that would be useful. Remember: ban list is not a right it's a privilege. How can you possibly not understand rule #23 though. It's simple: you can't ban someone from your maps for personal reasons or if you don't supply a reason. That's it. That's all there is to it.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:22
What reason? where did you give us a list of justifiable reasons? ...what is it you dont understand? I dont want you to tell me and decide what does reasons might be ...i want an exact rule that i can follow on. And define me a personal reason? ...see, your rules are so wide and open for looking at them as anyone see fit that we can discuss over and over whenever a new shit comes up or a new appeal.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:29
this ^^. I have never encountered a game before where published player created content belonged to the player. Not to the extent where finding their content is popular they can withdraw it and make demands. A terms of service as described should be introduced, itll ruffle some feathers initially and might cause some maps to get pulled down in rage. However over the long run it would prevent a lot of drama.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:33
So you had never played a mod before? or a game with servers? Fuck, in Battlefield you can get permabanned from a server by having a good K/D ratio.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:38
I'm not making any maps if they aren't my property.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:41
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 11:44
lewl
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:04
youd be surprised. I played age of empires before, there custom maps were editable by anyone. Someone could publish a new scenario and theyd get credited with it but if they took it down someone else would simply republish it. As it were many versions of the same map would appear if it gained popularity. On evony which i used to play and i know skitz plays, the terms of service you accepted when you made an account made it so anything you bought with your own real money belonged to the company. Legally you had very little rights if anything happened to the goods/services you were buying. And people were dropping several thousand dollars/euros on that game, so much so that a blackmarket developed and still thrives within the game. You guys have it so good here, and here you are demanding more rights, rights which are being and will be abused. I believe you have good intentions tunder, but many of the other mapmakers, like adog for example, i do not.
nobody is disrespecting the mapmakers. I have great respect for the works of tiktok, tunder and a handful of others. You can see the time and effort put into making their maps. Anyone with any comprehension of how the mapmaking process on aw works couldnt not respect them. The maps are accredited in their name, that should be enough. However the ability to make a good/popular map shouldnt give a player the rights to strongarm the admins and the mods to acquiesce to their wishes. Its gonna cause problems, someone of questionable character throwing their weight around because they control the distribution of a popular map. i know my opinion will be an unpopular one but just putting it out there.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:08
Agreed. The problem with maps are that the mapmakers are themselves trolls and ban people for the most stupid of reasons.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:28
Im seriously geting pissed about mods not answering me on why it took them few days to come up with pathetic rule instead of making it clear without the need for anyone to question anything. Bad job. And no answer to me on why should i be forced to allow someone who bashes my map to play on it (nothing personal, just business). And i have to say, people who cry to be unbaned from a map they bashed or map maker they insulted are pathetic ...i would be ashamed if i played on a map of a person i insulted.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:32
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Rankist Sharck खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। |
19.01.2015 - 12:33 Rankist Sharck खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। TBF, Adog isn't part of the strike
लदान...
लदान...
|
19.01.2015 - 12:36
Quote ...from who? Written by who and when? ...do you think im an idiot Pulse?
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:36
thats a bit dramatic... I supported the previous mapmakers strike, it was well intentioned and demanded an issue that needed adressing be noticed. However what you guys seek now is the ability to ban players on your own personal whims. for example "i dont like this guy cause hes asian, banned" "i dont like this guy cause hes friends with an asian, banned" While you or goblin may not pull this kind of thing, others will.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
19.01.2015 - 12:38
Perhaps, but i mentioned him specifically because of the forum threads he made after the original strike when it was announced a banlist would be implemented.
----
लदान...
लदान...
|
क्या आपको यकीन है?