Discussion about strats nerfed/boosted

Tell me what strat you think should get boosted/nerfed & tell me why you think it should.
Because I dont think it does.. ;_;

Bitches

HW boost it. Its not worth the SP, I have never used it in a real game.

I think GC should be bosted. For sure. Definitely. What do you think about that, Waffel?

Sky mence should be bosted aw player turned from bombers spam to Perfect Defence spam , SM should have stayed the same as it was

No strategy should be boosted ...it basicly sucks, i never use it anymore.

Boost TG

लिखा द्वारा YazanTheSexy, 19.09.2014 at 05:32

Sky mence should be bosted aw player turned from bombers spam to Perfect Defence spam , SM should have stayed the same as it was

No SM boost, pls... its already one of the strongest strategy in the game.

लिखा द्वारा Steve Aoki, 19.09.2014 at 04:56

I think GC should be bosted. For sure. Definitely. What do you think about that, Waffel?

Bitch D: ur so mean. Laochra is not yet here.

लिखा द्वारा Goblin, 19.09.2014 at 07:12

No strategy should be boosted ...it basicly sucks, i never use it anymore.

Same

Dont touch my pd.......

In gc add +1 def for infs and +1 range for tanks

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 09:15

In gc add +1 def for infs and +1 range for tanks

Stay off GC.

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

See, this is what I meant bitch <3 xD You want it because u gain something with it ;-;

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 09:15

In gc add +1 def for infs and +1 range for tanks

I think that boost is a little bit too much, but still agree on GC boost. Some.. small..
And make imp inf's to cost less!

लिखा द्वारा Steve Aoki, 19.09.2014 at 10:31

I think that boost is a little bit too much.

Thing is gc is one strat I am not sure how to use since infs are useless in attack. If you compare mos with gc you have marines with same attack as tanks costing same but advantage marines are invisible. If you compare infs between mos and gc infs are untouched in mos, meaning infs are good in defense but can also be used in attack.

I was hoping this boost will help make people play it more(since I think it is probably worst strat after hw and rc). But seems some people think gc is OP on its own . So dunno.

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 10:40

लिखा द्वारा Steve Aoki, 19.09.2014 at 10:31

I think that boost is a little bit too much.

Thing is gc is one strat I am not sure how to use since infs are useless in attack. If you compare mos with gc you have marines with same attack as tanks costing same but advantage marines are invisible. If you compare infs between mos and gc infs are untouched in mos, meaning infs are good in defense but can also be used in attack.

I was hoping this boost will help make people play it more(since I think it is probably worst strat after hw and rc). But seems some people think gc is OP on its own . So dunno.

So because you dont know how to play GC it needs a boost? This is what I meant with people asking for boosts for their own benefits. GC does not need boost at all. Its just not that easy playable in europe+ But you can play it... Its a challenge and its fun to play.

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 09:41

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

See, this is what I meant bitch <3 xD You want it because u gain something with it ;-;

thanks for quoting my trolling post and using it to accuse me of being selfish.

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 10:52

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 09:41

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

See, this is what I meant bitch <3 xD You want it because u gain something with it ;-;

thanks for quoting my trolling post and using it to accuse me of being selfish.

You're welcome :3

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

You look like someone who may be interested in a little extra help, so here you go:

Don't mind spart please, spoiler alert.

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 10:51

So because you dont know how to play GC it needs a boost? This is what I meant with people asking for boosts for their own benefits. GC does not need boost at all. Its just not that easy playable in europe+ But you can play it... Its a challenge and its fun to play.

wow OP argument! So if I don't know how to play that strat its my fault and nothing wrong with the strat right !!! I said why I think GC should be boosted you haven't said any reason why it shouldn't. I probably won't play gc even if its boosted. And yes all strats are playable and fun to play no matter how bad they are. That doesn't mean it they shouldn't be improved.

लिखा द्वारा Spart, 19.09.2014 at 10:57

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

Boost pd sm and imp, really weak strategies, also i want gw boosted too, +2 def to milita and +2 hp to marines so i can stomp everyone on every map on every setting with my favourite strat .

also nerf ra, too much op.

You look like someone who may be interested in a little extra help, so here you go:

omg ill be there, will professor trollvis1122 be giving the lesson?

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 11:04

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 10:51

So because you dont know how to play GC it needs a boost? This is what I meant with people asking for boosts for their own benefits. GC does not need boost at all. Its just not that easy playable in europe+ But you can play it... Its a challenge and its fun to play.

wow OP argument! So if I don't know how to play that strat its my fault and nothing wrong with the strat right !!!

Actually it is? Or you are that kind of person when he loses he blames his strat?

And GC doesn't need nerf, just 1 thing. You just said you dont play GC. How would you ever know that it needs boosts or not lol?
Greate >COMBINATOR< is a strategy combined with strong attack on tanks and weak attack on infantry. Infantry have good deffence and tanks don't so they kinda fit each other because attack and deffense is COMBINED..
The tanks of GC are that expensive because this strat isnt used to RUSH like most of you guys use almost every strat for now days..

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 11:06

लिखा द्वारा Spart, 19.09.2014 at 10:57

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 09:20

omg ill be there, will professor trollvis1122 be giving the lesson?

Actually, we will be having a few courses and professors:

How to Be a Female Drama Queen
Professor Waffel
3:00-3:30

How to Laugh Like 12-Year Old Turkish Boy
Professor Your Monkey
3:30-4:00

Seriously, I Am Not Trolling
Professor Eagles8539
4:00-4:30

Ghosting 101
Professor Skills
4:30-5:00

Picking Up Turkish Girls
Professor Stomach Ulcers
5:00-5:30

How Central and South America Became Mexican Territories
Professor Spart w/ Special Appearances By Mexican Locals AlexMeza and Clovis1122
5:30-6:00

Please feel free to stay for as many as you want.

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 11:11

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 11:04

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 10:51

So because you dont know how to play GC it needs a boost? This is what I meant with people asking for boosts for their own benefits. GC does not need boost at all. Its just not that easy playable in europe+ But you can play it... Its a challenge and its fun to play.

wow OP argument! So if I don't know how to play that strat its my fault and nothing wrong with the strat right !!!

Actually it is? Or you are that kind of person when he loses he blames his strat?

And GC doesn't need nerf, just 1 thing. You just said you dont play GC. How would you ever know that it needs boosts or not lol?
Greate >COMBINATOR< is a strategy combined with strong attack on tanks and weak attack on infantry. Infantry have good deffence and tanks don't so they kinda fit each other because attack and deffense is COMBINED..
The tanks of GC are that expensive because this strat isnt used to RUSH like most of you guys use almost every strat for now days..

gc needs a boost because it lacks competitively, in almost every situation you can use gc, sm pd or mos are a better choice to maximise your chances of winning. Competitive gameplay is the backbone of any gaming community, and it is on this which the strats are balanced. Just because YOU like gc in its current form that doesnt mean the strat should remain the same.

and since you just so definitely dismissed minusseven's opinion waffel, its worth noting in our discussion earlier that you were completely against any boosts to the current gc. however you were completely for restoring gc to its original stats before it was nerfed., which is also a boost the strat. based on this i can only conclude that you fear change, and are a conservative.

लिखा द्वारा Permamuted, 19.09.2014 at 11:24

gc needs a boost because it lacks competitively, in almost every situation you can use gc, sm pd or mos are a better choice to maximise your chances of winning. Competitive gameplay is the backbone of any gaming community, and it is on this which the strats are balanced. Just because YOU like gc in its current form that doesnt mean the strat should remain the same.

and since you just so definitely dismissed minusseven's opinion waffel, its worth noting in our discussion earlier that you were completely against any boosts to the current gc. however you were completely for restoring gc to its original stats before it was nerfed., which is also a boost the strat. based on this i can only conclude that you fear change, and are a conservative.

Restoring it to old stats isnt a boost in my eyes, its just getting back to the way it was.
You guys are talking about adding +1 attack to the tanks making the tanks 90 gold and adding more def to the infantries?
That isn't GC anymore, that is Tank General ...

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 11:11

Actually it is? Or you are that kind of person when he loses he blames his strat?

And GC doesn't need nerf, just 1 thing. You just said you dont play GC. How would you ever know that it needs boosts or not lol?
Greate >COMBINATOR< is a strategy combined with strong attack on tanks and weak attack on infantry. Infantry have good deffence and tanks don't so they kinda fit each other because attack and deffense is COMBINED..
The tanks of GC are that expensive because this strat isnt used to RUSH like most of you guys use almost every strat for now days..

I don't play GC so I can't blame GC for my failures. I tried it, felt it was pretty bad and I am telling you why. Let me give you the reason all over again.
1) you conceded yourself its bad for rushes and not good for eu+ games meaning basically 99% cws .
2)lets compare it other strats pd : infs cost 50 have 4 attack so 2 inf =8 attack 1 gc tank cost 110 have 8attack so inf better since cheaper.
gc inf cost 60 don't have +1 defense just + 1 hp so pd infs -10 cost but very little difference in defense. only difference being -1 range for infs in pd. If you can play with the -1 range its better obviously.
mos : marines cost 110 same as gc tanks have same attack but are invisible and have +1 range
inf cost the same, yes gc gives +1 hp but inf in mos are untouched and gives 4 attack and can be used for attack and defense.

meh I would prefer nc to gc lol. Biggest problem with gc being once you make infs you can't use them in attack as they are very weak with it and same with tanks if they are attacked they are dead. Only in world games would they be playable and even then players with other strats can steam roll them.

Maybe if you play gc well you could teach us how to play it well.

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 11:30

Restoring it to old stats isnt a boost in my eyes, its just getting back to the way it was.
You guys are talking about adding +1 attack to the tanks making the tanks 90 gold and adding more def to the infantries?
That isn't GC anymore, that is Tank General ...

I said +1 def to infs and + 1 range to tanks, I never said + 1 attack to tanks and -20 cost to make it relentless attack.

लिखा द्वारा minusSeven, 19.09.2014 at 12:27

लिखा द्वारा Waffel, 19.09.2014 at 11:11

Actually it is? Or you are that kind of person when he loses he blames his strat?

And GC doesn't need nerf, just 1 thing. You just said you dont play GC. How would you ever know that it needs boosts or not lol?
Greate >COMBINATOR< is a strategy combined with strong attack on tanks and weak attack on infantry. Infantry have good deffence and tanks don't so they kinda fit each other because attack and deffense is COMBINED..
The tanks of GC are that expensive because this strat isnt used to RUSH like most of you guys use almost every strat for now days..

I don't play GC so I can't blame GC for my failures. I tried it, felt it was pretty bad and I am telling you why. Let me give you the reason all over again.
1) you conceded yourself its bad for rushes and not good for eu+ games meaning basically 99% cws .
2)lets compare it other strats pd : infs cost 50 have 4 attack so 2 inf =8 attack 1 gc tank cost 110 have 8attack so inf better since cheaper.
gc inf cost 60 don't have +1 defense just + 1 hp so pd infs -10 cost but very little difference in defense. only difference being -1 range for infs in pd. If you can play with the -1 range its better obviously.
mos : marines cost 110 same as gc tanks have same attack but are invisible and have +1 range
inf cost the same, yes gc gives +1 hp but inf in mos are untouched and gives 4 attack and can be used for attack and defense.

meh I would prefer nc to gc lol. Biggest problem with gc being once you make infs you can't use them in attack as they are very weak with it and same with tanks if they are attacked they are dead. Only in world games would they be playable and even then players with other strats can steam roll them.

Maybe if you play gc well you could teach us how to play it well.

Yes its a fact PD is better in common vs almost most strats no doubt about it. But because PD is this lets call it ''powerfull'' it doesn't mean GC and any other strats like HW and stuff suck? Blitz used to be the number 1 less played strat before it got the boost with not -2 deffense but -1.
Now you see almost every person playing blitz is rushing the crap out of the games and mostly ruin their team in 3v3's or ruin 1v1's. Is this how you want a slowroll strategy called GC to be? You want a Tank General spam in 3v3s? because im pretty sure when GC gets boosted it will happen. And a beautifull strat for people who love to slowroll and actualy enjoy playing a game with a challenge gets ruined because of a boost people need. People dont play GC because they dont feel like having a hard game, they take an easier way and go for PD. So they can STACK their caps and rush their STACKS. GC is a combinated gameplay which includes infantries who cant do that much damage.