GOD 2.0 लेखो: 176 (Message) से (User): USA
|
When starting a game we buy a country to be our capital. the only unique thing about it is if someone else takes it u lose and the general . but what if u can have a more powerful capital country like an extra 5% or 10% income from your capital country plus capital city gets a extra +1 reinforcement every 4 turns. but if your thinking if someone else gets my capital then they get bonuses then no its just normal to them.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Seems good!
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
लदान...
लदान...
|
AlexMeza खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है। |
AlexMeza खाता खाते को नष्ट कर दिया है।
Don't support. In world games or long games, you would get a lot of reinfs in your cap.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I think a basic improvement could be made to the capital country without making it too overpowered. The reinforcement idea's too much, but the income increase is a nice idea. This could actually make it more worthwhile to grab larger countries to start off games, because someone who takes India (Commonly regarded as a bad idea since it costs so much) would get a much nicer income bonus than someone who used Pakistan to take India.
I think, if anything, this would actually balance gameplay further if you were to only be giving +5% or +10% income to the capital country.
----
~goodnamesalltaken~
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I thought he mean't like if you picked Germany then Berlin would get 9 reinf. every 4 turns instead of 8. Well just keep the income then.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
लदान...
लदान...
|
Cherse लेखो: 329 (Message) से (User): UK
|
I support something like this... or some kind of difference between home country and conquered countries. irl conquered countries surely don't bring as much revenue / manpower as a home country? in fact I really don't know what happens in that situation irl. any experts?
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Well the populace would be devastated. Also frequent revolts and nationalism.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
I don't like this idea, seems sort of pointless. Plus, it makes strong countries even stronger. :S
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
लदान...
लदान...
|
Cherse लेखो: 329 (Message) से (User): UK
|
लदान...
लदान...
|