Ouch लेखो: 72 (Message) से (User): USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f49f1/f49f15d359d8df13e5c0c5f78ca374990b9b743c" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
लदान...
लदान...
|
Homero लेखो: 78 (Message) से (User): पोलैंड
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b75dd/b75dd3ab65ebe60e38031115d799139b399e5ea2" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
लदान...
लदान...
|
Homero लेखो: 78 (Message) से (User): पोलैंड
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b75dd/b75dd3ab65ebe60e38031115d799139b399e5ea2" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
लदान...
लदान...
|