"Gender Theory"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/texas-father-blocked-from-stopping-gender-transition-of-son-james-7-to-girl-called-luna

लिखा द्वारा Columna Durruti, 02.10.2019 at 15:58

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 02.10.2019 at 11:25

"(...) billionaire president fighting the establishment (...)"

Wut?! You must be watching a different movie.
The one that invented "cultural marxism" and "gender ideology".

Such a conspiracy. Nothing to see here.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gender-theory

>Butler
>Levi-Strauss
>Sartre
>Freud
>Foucault
>Derrida
>de Beauvoir

None of this had any impact on us at all. None. It's just a conspiracy.

अवतरण:

Was chemically castrating 7 years old's part of your plan?

Yeah, world is creepy.

Allowing your child or deciding/empowering this kind of behavior at this age is despicable and intolerable.

I'm an advocate for a spectrum-based view on social gender roles, but the thought of allowing permanent bodily disfigurement and mental dissociation at any age is fucking appalling. Some people are born more masculine than feminine or vice versa, no one is born to suffer like this. We live in clown world.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 22.10.2019 at 17:01

I'm an advocate for a spectrum-based view on social gender roles

What?

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 23.10.2019 at 11:38

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 22.10.2019 at 17:01

I'm an advocate for a spectrum-based view on social gender roles

What?

There are no binary genders; You are X% Masculine, X% Feminine, no matter your sex. By organizing people into two niches rather than the biological imperative which states we have Alphas, Betas, Omegas, etc, you're discounting our natural social order and cohesion.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 23.10.2019 at 11:49

There are no binary genders; You are X% Masculine, X% Feminine, no matter your sex. By organizing people into two niches rather than the biological imperative which states we have Alphas, Betas, Omegas, etc, you're discounting our natural social order and cohesion.

What...

There are only 2 genders why is that hard to accept :/ ?

लिखा द्वारा Brsjak, 23.10.2019 at 15:24

There are only 2 genders why is that hard to accept :/ ?

You racist, how dare you exclude binary genders and 69% feminine alphas!

The genders are two, you are either born a boy or a girl and you most certainly will die like one.

People changing their gender is a serious psychological problem.

लिखा द्वारा Cold Case, 23.10.2019 at 16:42

The genders are two, you are either born a boy or a girl and you most certainly will die like one.

People changing their gender is a serious psychological problem.

Social Gender =/= Biological Sex.

You'd think they would draw the line with kids

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 23.10.2019 at 11:49

There are no binary genders; You are X% Masculine, X% Feminine, no matter your sex. By organizing people into two niches rather than the biological imperative which states we have Alphas, Betas, Omegas, etc, you're discounting our natural social order and cohesion.

I'm standing with Tito on this. Any kind of deconstructionism on this almost always leads to calamity. The most beta of men are still 'men'. Women who can't have children are still women, and no matter the surgery, a man remains a man, minus his genitalia. There are outliers who are an extremely small number but in most of those cases; the parents tend to make the decision to assign them one gender in order to make their lives easier.

Gender is binary and shouldn't be up for debate. It's an unnecessary deconstruction firmly based on a liberal individualist mentality. This deconstructionism has led to ruin and societal anxiety. It's just dangerous. People have enough problems without their metaphysical interpretation of reality crashing down on them. It's baked into our language and is a direct product of thousands of years of development. Eroding this subliminal and foundational concept is dangerous.

It's also a clear distraction created by post-modernist ex-marxists and continued on by neo-liberals. It prevents class recognition, depresses the populace and clearly raises anxieties over peoples place in the world. 'Trans' is the new liberation front, all the money and effort is put into it while genuine issues over decades of bad policy are swept aside. This, in my opinion, is an extremely oppressive narrative. It's conceptual 'Brutalism' used to deracinate the individual from their natural collective, and reminds them that they are an insignificant meaningless speck with no power, will or place. The visceral reaction of anyone reading this pure horror. It is designed to fuck with you: "We will castrate your kids and there is nothing you can do about it, peasant."

I'm trans, what's the problem

लिखा द्वारा Cold Case, 23.10.2019 at 16:42

The genders are two, you are either born a boy or a girl and you most certainly will die like one.

People changing their gender is a serious psychological problem.

Looking at the data, there is a small subset, about 0.2% of the population, that is sort of "stuck in the wrong body". Very feminine men, or masculine females, who afterwards don't regret transitioning. For those people, I guess they should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own body after they turn 18. Most transgenders aren't like this though, most are just mentally unstable and have a fetish, that becomes their life. Those people need fucking treatment.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 23.10.2019 at 17:15

Social Gender =/= Biological Sex.

Social Gender? Ok now you are outright trolling. What's next, Job Gender? City Gender? Religion's Gender?

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 10:58

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 23.10.2019 at 17:15

Social Gender =/= Biological Sex.

Social Gender? Ok now you are outright trolling. What's next, Job Gender? City Gender? Religion's Gender?

I adhere to the Structural Functionalism theory of Sociology for macro-problems, and the theory of Symbolic Interactionism for micro ones. Following in-line with both of these theories, you have a place in a given society based upon your titles and your interactions with other people; say I'm an adherent to Labeling theory if you must, but I would argue that gender dysphoria constitutes a meaningful interaction that results in being labelled as an "other"; the Social Gender hypothesis attemtps to organize different labels into quantifiable and attributable groups. Now as I've previously argued: There are not seventy-two genders, nor should I add are mental illnesses a quantifiable means by which to label someone. Discerning between the corrupt and the ill is a difficult task here, but to put it thusly: Many societies throughout history have recognized more than two genders due to the genetic differences between feminine and masculine attributes in many people. Gender here not referring to your biological sex, but your structural role in society: A man with a genetic predisposition against physical work and instead towards planning in a primal society would be just as valuable as the hunter or the scavenger. Hell, it's the reason the neolithic revolution sprang in the first place. But I digress.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:16

I adhere to the Structural Functionalism theory of Sociology for macro-problems, and the theory of Symbolic Interactionism for micro ones.

And i adhere to Aule-Mairon Sauron's New Order, and a Theory of Ainulindale Discord.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:16

the Social Gender hypothesis attemtps to organize different labels into quantifiable and attributable groups.

So you admit it's just a:

1. Hypothesis
2. Attempting

In other words you still don't have tangible results and examples in reality. Yet governments already shoving this theory down our throats.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:16

Many societies throughout history have recognized more than two genders due to the genetic differences between feminine and masculine attributes in many people.

And all those societies degenerated and collapsed when they started to sexually roleplay.

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 11:39

And i adhere to Aule-Mairon Sauron's New Order, and a Theory of Ainulindale Discord.

Typically Balk response.

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 11:39

So you admit it's just a:

1. Hypothesis
2. Attempting

In other words you still don't have tangible results and examples in reality. Yet governments already shoving this theory down our throats.

You don't understand how the scientific method operates, do you? I label it a hypothesis because the evidence suggesting physical alteration via transexualism isn't a mental disorder is conjecture in my opinion, whereas gender dysphoria onset by genetic and environmental factors is completely sound. Someone like Chevalier d'Éon comes to mind.

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 11:39

And all those societies degenerated and collapsed when they started to sexually roleplay.

Egyptian-Helleni culture is still rampant in the West, five thousand cumulative years and still kicking. How does sexual roleplaying have anything to do with gender dysphoria in this context? Are you attempting a slippery slope by suggesting all people born with gender dysphoria are raging sexual degenerates?

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:53

Egyptian-Helleni culture is still rampant in the West, five thousand cumulative years and still kicking.

Egyptians and Greeks had cycles of Chaos, during which they raped, killed, and ransacked Temples. Not really nice to copy is it, but guess where this repeats? You already gave an answer.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:53

How does sexual roleplaying have anything to do with gender dysphoria in this context? Are you attempting a slippery slope by suggesting all people born with gender dysphoria are raging sexual degenerates?

Well i don't want to blame you personally, but people talking like you are dragging us on the slippery slope to degeneration. It is not even science, you can't diagnose it, and people were locked up in the looney house for less. People like me lived for 5000 years without even questioning such things, because it is bloody obvious and we are 99%. Any individual or group starting this topic clearly has an agenda behind it, and it isn't sexually insecure wellbeing.

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 12:18

Egyptians and Greeks had cycles of Chaos, during which they raped, killed, and ransacked Temples. Not really nice to copy is it, but guess where this repeats? You already gave an answer.

You're equating the Bronze Age collapse, the Nubian invasions, and various famines and uprisings over class discrepancies to people with gender dysphoria? I honestly think we're on different pages here: I'm not defending crazed blue-haired feministas throwing rocks at people and wearing Antifa gear, nor am I defending mentally deranged individuals that chop off their genitals, only to have a 41% chance of suicide thereafter. There are legitimately people that do not feel comfortable with who they are, and you can call that a mental disorder if you desire, but it's not something they have the ability to change without living horribly.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 11:53

Well i don't want to blame you personally, but people talking like you are dragging us on the slippery slope to degeneration. It is not even science, you can't diagnose it, and people were locked up in the looney house for less. People like me lived for 5000 years without even questioning such things, because it is bloody obvious and we are 99%. Any individual or group starting this topic clearly has an agenda behind it, and it isn't sexually insecure wellbeing.

>it's not science, you can't diagnose it

Literally what? And yes, we used to put people in asylums for inane shit. My grandmother nearly had a lobotomy in the sixties because she has manic depression, but thankfully as a society we've decided brutality isn't the solution to mental disorders.

I have no agenda behind supporting people like this, I'm not sure if you can comprehend the paradox these people have to deal with daily: Live a lie and repress your mental self-realized self to appease strangers, or live how you see fit and have strangers loathe your existence. This is a developmental question most people ask throughout their lives, and forms a very keen philosophical divide between Western and other cultures: Western philosophy is built upon Stoicism and Individualism, and in both of these schools of thought, you personal strength to do and live as you see fit is paramount. Living for the sake of others beyond your primary and secondary groups is not a concept you can adhere to, only recently in the past few centuries has the concept of a national identity seeped its way into the Western conscious, for a tertiary group to consider. But it is through this tertiary grouping that conflict like this arises, much like any other wedge issue such as abortion, immigration, UBI, etc.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 12:53

There are legitimately people that do not feel comfortable with who they are

Welcome to real life... We legitimately feel uncomfortable when we see someone have hotter girlfriend(am i ugly), we legitimately feel uncomfortable when we see someone drive better car(am i poor), go to more exotic vacation(am i boring), and asking ourselves daily are we on the good path currently, or did we miss something.

Asking ourselves who we are is the one of the oldest questions, and you want to solve it through option of choosing genders?

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 13:07

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 12:53

There are legitimately people that do not feel comfortable with who they are

Welcome to real life... We legitimately feel uncomfortable when we see someone have hotter girlfriend(am i ugly), we legitimately feel uncomfortable when we see someone drive better car(am i poor), go to more exotic vacation(am i boring), and asking ourselves daily are we on the good path currently, or did we miss something.

Asking ourselves who we are is the one of the oldest questions, and you want to solve it through option of choosing genders?

Do you still not understand what the difference between sex and gender is?

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 14:20

Do you still not understand what the difference between sex and gender is?

Sex is gender, from the latin word for gender - sex. It is not US constitution to be interpreted as you like.

लिखा द्वारा Skanderbeg, 25.10.2019 at 14:31

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 14:20

Do you still not understand what the difference between sex and gender is?

Sex is gender, from the latin word for gender - sex. It is not US constitution to be interpreted as you like.

Sex and gender are not interchangeable since the past decade, progress happens all the time. If you don't agree with that, that's fine. But that's my stance on the matter.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 25.10.2019 at 14:47

Sex and gender are not interchangeable since the past decade, progress happens all the time. If you don't agree with that, that's fine. But that's my stance on the matter.

I agree progress exist, but not in nature and biology. You can observe and take notes from the nature, but there is no progress, just repetition of life.

You say it is not interchangeable 'since the past decade', does this mean we can change everything just because we want to? If i say i fly, and you agree, does that mean i can truly fly? If we agree 2+2=5, if we all agree and delete all previous data, is that really the truth?

Are we gonna vote on everything today? If most of society agree to legalize gays or trans or gender dysphoria or whatever you call it, should we accept it as normal?