Xanxth लेखो: 83 (Message) से (User): USA
|
We should have a function to make a transport be able to load planes, so aircraft carriers work properly. They should also be able to still carry troops(or a seperate transport unit/function for an amphibious assault ship)
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लदान...
लदान...
|
x______
लेखो: 330 (Message) से (User): यूक्रेन
|
Except
1. usually planes have greater range than any boat, why transport?
2. you would only render the planes vulnerable by putting them on a carrier since if carrier sinks -> planes go down
so question would be - what kind of advantage would that ever give lol?
----
не смотри где я - лучше смотри где ты
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
लदान...
लदान...
|
|
Maximus, were you born retarded or is that something ukrainians get as bonus in life?
लदान...
लदान...
|
x______
लेखो: 330 (Message) से (User): यूक्रेन
|
लिखा द्वारा Evic, 07.09.2016 at 22:13
Maximus, were you born retarded or is that something ukrainians get as bonus in life?
Plz tell me how this is useful addition outside of RP games
----
не смотри где я - лучше смотри где ты
लदान...
लदान...
|
x______
लेखो: 330 (Message) से (User): यूक्रेन
|
You can follow me around all you want civec and be a racist idgaf but I just don't see how anyone would use this, why build a fleet of aircraft carriers to transport around bombers.... Like OK some of you play unlimited money games with infinite units but then it's just a hassle. A logical person would minimize the money spent on expensive transport and maximize the expenses on actual offensive or defensive troops
Sure if amok has nothing to do in spare time tho then go ahead I support
----
не смотри где я - лучше смотри где ты
लदान...
लदान...
|