Disconnection Sanctuary

As always, from time to time, Afterwind needs a nap. A long nap. So during those times where AW decides to take a random break for almost no reason at all. We shall have a haven to mingle while it dozes down for a kip.

So

Sexytime stories?
Racial awareness tales?
Political Intrigue?
Day to day business?

Perhaps something more personal...

Is Pinheiro really Castro stuck inside a machine?

Will Fruit ever realize that bowl on their head is made of plastic?

Will Vagineer realize he's white?

Will Zizou ever speak?

Is Gard no longer Gard?

no

"Will Zizou ever speak?" I think Ive seen zizou speak once.

In this post, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to initiate meaningful change. I will start this discussion by arguing that callow witlings represent one of the most vainglorious wings of caustic terrorism you can find. Then, I will present evidence that we must reach out to people with the message that it does not require a Sherlock Holmes to prove that Atty. Tik Tok is emotionally insecure and has a difficult time admitting that he's wrong. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to argue about his taradiddles.
It is not uncommon for Tik to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole venom-spouting affair as some great benefit to humanity. As witnesses to mankind's inner dissatisfaction, we must let him know, in no uncertain terms, that he is an adept at selling otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, blaming unsympathetic frotteurism on homicidal turncoats is one of his favorite themes. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, nothing unites people like a common enemy. That's why I would encourage everybody to take some shots of their own at Tik by reprimanding him for putting callous protestors on the federal payroll. Although some violent imbeciles reluctantly concede that some of his anal-retentive, horny obiter dicta are so self-contradictory, they're their own refutation, they invariably deny that unlike him, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if—and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty"—Tik were not actually responsible for trying to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse, then I'd stop saying that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Tik's subterfuge. I'm thoroughly stunned.
Tik recently went through a careerism phase in which he tried repeatedly to hurt people's feelings. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an ignominious wacko. It's a fact. Here's an idea: Instead of giving him the ability to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death, why don't we shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within his pea-sized brain? If we do, we'll then be able to remind him about the concept of truth in advertising. So remember kids, if you want to cause an increase in disease, egotism, crime, and vice, all you have to do is agree to let Tik challenge all I stand for. In short, I will not stand by and let anyone twist my words or change my position in order to serve some fork-tongued political strategy.

Soooooooooo long.......................................... Can barely read it without loosing track of where I was....................................................



"LilD" best rapper on AW

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

I still don't get this point..............................

"LilD" best rapper on AW

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

OMG WAIT U DID THAT OMG SO ORIGINAL AND FUNNY XXAAXXAXAXA

also, if you wanted to make your point stronger you'd know that it's "were", not "we're", nice try though...
(also, of course I got that, I pointed out the flaws in your shitty post because it wasn't funny and all around poorly thought out and bad)

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 20.11.2011 at 11:57

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

OMG WAIT U DID THAT OMG SO ORIGINAL AND FUNNY XXAAXXAXAXA

also, if you wanted to make your point stronger you'd know that it's "were", not "we're", nice try though...
(also, of course I got that, I pointed out the flaws in your shitty post because it wasn't funny and all around poorly thought out and bad)

I'm not starting a damned flame war with your lonely ass, just drop it.

I'm not picking sides here but Gard is right. It would be wise to drop it.

"LilD" best rapper on AW

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 20.11.2011 at 12:33

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 20.11.2011 at 11:57

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

लिखा द्वारा VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

OMG WAIT U DID THAT OMG SO ORIGINAL AND FUNNY XXAAXXAXAXA

also, if you wanted to make your point stronger you'd know that it's "were", not "we're", nice try though...
(also, of course I got that, I pointed out the flaws in your shitty post because it wasn't funny and all around poorly thought out and bad)

I'm not starting a damned flame war with your lonely ass, just drop it.

last post here, but aren't you the one complaining about being lonely and hated all the time? ;__;

लिखा द्वारा Garde, 20.11.2011 at 12:33

I'm not starting a damned flame war with your lonely ass, just drop it.

>not starting flamewar
>starts flaming

Last post here. Please proceed with your bitch fight.