Anti-Aircraft

लेखो: 7 द्वारा देखा गया है .: 64 users

Barrymore zizonists लेखो: 367 (Message) से (User): Falkland Islands	13.03.2012 - 03:23 Barrymore Since this unit is totally ignored it could use a bit of a change. I'm thinking it acts like a general in that it gives +1 defence against bombers and stealths (and helis I guess) to all units in the stack. Multiple anti-aircraft do not stack this effect, it is capped at +1 per unit. It also has 0 movement so it represents a physical structure within a city rather than a unit (Pretty much to stop the AA being moved around as part of a megastack of units). I'm wondering whether units can be created that represent fixed physical objects (like buildings etc.) that cannot be moved via. any transport and simply act as buffs for that city (like Officers and Admirals, but for Cities). It would open up a whole new world of strategy if you had to plan and invest in your empires infrastructure as well. Anyway, discuss. ---- लिखा द्वारा Amok, 29.04.2012 at 08:36 Gardevoir, your obnoxiousness really baffles me sometimes...just leave for good already or stop whining. लदान... लदान...
Aristosseur zizonists लेखो: 1486 (Message) से (User): यूनान	13.03.2012 - 15:10 Aristosseur Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them. ---- Afterwind Summer 1v1 Tournament Final Victory With music and annotation Afterwind Autumn/Winter 2v2 Tournament Final Victory Only music this time लदान... लदान...
Deray YG For The Glory of Saw लेखो: 2645 (Message) से (User): USA	13.03.2012 - 15:35 Deray YG लिखा द्वारा Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10 Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them. They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there. ---- I like stuff.... Yay? लदान... लदान...
nonames लेखो: 1325 (Message) से (User): UK	13.03.2012 - 21:03 nonames लिखा द्वारा Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35 लिखा द्वारा Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10 Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them. They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there. not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry लदान... लदान...
DURRHUNTER The Entente लेखो: 874 (Message) से (User): USA	13.03.2012 - 21:09 DURRHUNTER लिखा द्वारा nonames, 13.03.2012 at 21:03 लिखा द्वारा Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35 लिखा द्वारा Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10 Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them. They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there. not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry yeah 3 infantry or 1 AA? ---- लिखा द्वारा NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04 I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me? लदान... लदान...
DURRHUNTER The Entente लेखो: 874 (Message) से (User): USA	13.03.2012 - 21:09 DURRHUNTER लिखा द्वारा nonames, 13.03.2012 at 21:03 लिखा द्वारा Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35 लिखा द्वारा Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10 Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them. They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there. not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry yeah 3 infantry or 1 AA? ---- लिखा द्वारा NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04 I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me? लदान... लदान...
Deray YG For The Glory of Saw लेखो: 2645 (Message) से (User): USA	13.03.2012 - 23:39 Deray YG Thats why players use them in small numbers like 6-10 then just spam infantry. ---- I like stuff.... Yay? लदान... लदान...

के लिए खोज:
उपयोगकर्ता द्वारा:
फोरम में:
	विषय शीर्षक में संदेशों में